MitoCore Biosciences

CJC-1295 without DAC + Ipamorelin

Peptide Stack · Combination Concept

Dual-pathway growth-hormone-release research

2 min readLast reviewed September 8, 2026
2 componentsExact-Combination Evidence: Limited / General RationaleComponent Evidence: Varies by Component

What Is This Combination?

ERP catalog context: CJC-1295 without DAC 5 mg + Ipamorelin 5 mg -- total 10 mg

A pairing of a GHRH-receptor-type signal with a ghrelin/GHS-receptor secretagogue signal, grounded in general dual-pathway GH-release physiology -- not a clinical trial of this exact commercial formulation.

The Concept

A GHRH-receptor agonist-type signal is paired with a ghrelin/GHS-receptor secretagogue signal. Older GHRH-plus-GHRP/GHS physiology research supports the existence of two distinct upstream pathways converging on growth-hormone release. That general physiology does not prove this exact commercial combination is safe, effective, or superior to either component alone.

Meet the Components

CJC-1295 without DAC

5 mg

GHRH-receptor-type signaling arm

"CJC-1295 without DAC" is a marketplace label commonly equated with Modified GRF(1-29), though the naming is not consistently used across scientific and commercial sources. FDA's 2024 review distinguished CJC-1295 free base/acetate from DAC forms and found that most available clinical references concerned the DAC form specifically -- a separate evidence base for the non-DAC product as commonly sold has not been established.

Direct pharmacology, identity, characterization, efficacy, and safety data for the non-DAC form are limited, and duration/half-life findings from the DAC form do not transfer to this component. See the standalone Modified GRF(1-29) page for its full identity and evidence boundary.

Limited, identity-uncertain evidence

View CJC-1295 without DACresearch profile →

Ipamorelin

5 mg

ghrelin/GHS-receptor secretagogue signaling arm

Ipamorelin is a selective ghrelin-receptor (GHS-R) agonist studied for stimulating growth-hormone release through a receptor pathway distinct from a GHRH-receptor agonist, providing the physiological basis for pairing it with a GHRH-type signal.

See the standalone Ipamorelin page for its full evidence summary.

Independent human secretagogue evidence

View Ipamorelinresearch profile →

How the Roles Fit Together

ComponentCJC-1295 without DAC
ComponentIpamorelin
Conceptual goalDual-pathway growth-hormone-release research

What the Combination Is Intended to Address

Evidence-Supported Conceptual Domains

  • GH pulse physiology
  • GH/IGF-1 axis
  • endocrine secretagogue research
  • body-composition and recovery research

Community-Use Themes

The themes below are editorial summaries of commonly discussed community-use patterns. They are not controlled clinical evidence, systematically sourced community data, or established benefits.

  • sleep and recovery discussions(editorial-summary)
  • body composition discussions(editorial-summary)
  • training recovery discussions(editorial-summary)
  • "anti-aging" community framing(editorial-summary)

Concerns & Evidence Gaps

  • Safety Consideration

    No strong exact-product clinical outcome evidence exists for this combination.
  • Safety Consideration

    Elevated GH/IGF-1 signaling may be undesirable in some contexts and has not been evaluated for this pairing specifically.
  • Safety Consideration

    Glucose-handling effects are a recognized concern with GH-axis stimulation generally.
  • Safety Consideration

    Fluid retention and edema are a recognized concern with GH-axis stimulation generally.
  • Safety Consideration

    Paresthesia and carpal-tunnel-type effects are recognized concerns with GH-axis stimulation generally.
  • Safety Consideration

    Long-term combination safety is unknown.
  • Safety Consideration

    DAC/no-DAC naming confusion in the marketplace means the non-DAC component's exact identity and evidence base cannot be assumed to match DAC-form CJC-1295 literature.

Why Separate Components May Sometimes Be Preferable

Presented as a scientific/practical tradeoff, not a recommendation.

Favoring Separate Administration

  • Administering the GHRH-type and GHS-type signals independently allows each pathway's effects to be evaluated on its own.
  • The non-DAC component's own identity and evidence uncertainty is easier to reason about when it is not combined with a second, differently-evidenced compound.
  • No evidence-derived optimal ratio between the two components has been established.
  • Independent administration allows either signaling arm to be held or stopped without affecting the other.

Favoring the Fixed-Ratio Blend

  • A single combined vial is more convenient to source and administer than two separate components on two schedules.

Convenience is not evidence of biological superiority.

Evidence Boundary

The components of this combination have been investigated individually to varying degrees. Evidence for an individual component does not automatically establish the safety, efficacy, compatibility, or synergy of the exact combination. Where direct combination studies exist, MitoCore identifies that explicitly. Where they do not, the page describes the biological rationale for the combination rather than presenting the stack itself as a validated therapeutic intervention.

Exact-combination status: General GHRH-plus-GHS/GHRP dual-pathway physiology is described in the broader research literature, supporting the existence of two converging pathways to growth-hormone release. No clinical trial of this exact commercial formulation was located, and the non-DAC component's own identity and evidence base carry additional uncertainty.

Limitations: This 'limited' status refers to general dual-pathway growth-hormone-release physiology, not a clinical trial of this exact formulation. It does not establish safety, efficacy, an optimal ratio, or that combining the two produces a greater effect than either alone.

Component evidence: Evidence strength varies by component, and the non-DAC component in particular carries identity and evidence-base uncertainty distinct from the DAC form -- see each component's own standalone page.

Explore the Components

Each component's full evidence base lives on its own standalone research profile.

Disclaimer

See the anecdotal notice above for community-discussion context.

This page does not establish combination efficacy, safety, or compatibility beyond what is explicitly cited above. Always review each component's own standalone research profile for its full evidence base.